BGaming vs Playson: 145 vs 92 Games, Wider Reach?

BGaming carries 145 games in our catalog against 92 for Playson, yet Playson sits at 129 casinos in our database versus BGaming’s 124. A bigger library does not automatically buy wider distribution.

BGaming at a Glance

BGaming is licensed out of Valletta, Malta, with Marina Ostrovtsova as CEO and a declared client base of 3000+ B2B operators. Our records show two founding dates for the studio: 2018 on the operator-facing side and 2012 in the broader company record — a discrepancy worth flagging rather than smoothing over. Its own portfolio exceeds 250 titles, built on HTML5 video slots, of which 145 are checked and listed in our catalog, including Yin & Yang, Wild Mine, French Roulette, Alien Fruits and Alien Fruits 2.

Playson at a Glance

Playson Limited is a Malta-registered studio founded in 2012, led by CEO Alex Ivshin, with a consistent founding date across every record pulled for this comparison. The catalogue checked in this system totals 92 games, anchored by Buffalo Power Megaways, Buffalo Power 2: Hold and Win, Legend of Cleopatra Megaways, 100 Joker Staxx and Aquarium.

Catalog Size Showdown: 145 vs 92 Games

BGaming’s checked catalog runs almost sixty percent larger than Playson’s — 145 games against 92. The gap shows up in genre spread rather than raw volume alone: BGaming pairs slots like Wild Mine and Alien Fruits with table formats such as French Roulette, while Playson’s list leans harder into Megaways and Hold and Win slot mechanics, with titles like Buffalo Power Megaways and Legend of Cleopatra Megaways repeating that jackpot-adjacent formula across the lineup.

Why Does Playson Reach More Casinos Than BGaming?

Playson reaches 129 casinos in our database against 124 for BGaming, a five-casino edge despite carrying 53 fewer games. Distribution deals and aggregator placement, not catalog depth, decide how many casino lobbies a studio lands in — a smaller, more concentrated slot lineup can still clear more operator integrations than a broader one.

RTP and Game Quality Compared

Both studios post near-identical RTP bands: BGaming spans roughly 95.3% to 97.13%, Playson sits around 95% to 97% with an average near 96%. Neither range gives a clear volatility advantage on paper — the practical difference for a player sits in format mix rather than payout theory, since BGaming’s roulette and fruit-machine slots behave very differently at the table than Playson’s Megaways and Hold and Win mechanics.

Where Can You Play Both Providers?

Golden Star and Cashy both carry BGaming and Playson titles side by side, letting players switch between the two studios’ mechanics inside a single cashier. Playson additionally reaches SpinCrypto, with Playson available at 129 casinos in our database compared to BGaming’s 124.

Verdict: BGaming or Playson?

BGaming suits players who want format variety in one studio — roulette alongside fruit slots and jackpot-flavored titles — and who prioritize catalog depth over casino count. Playson fits players chasing Megaways and Hold and Win mechanics specifically, and it has a slightly better chance of showing up at a casino of choice given its 129-casino footprint. Neither studio is the stronger pick for a player hunting pure RTP; the bands overlap too closely to matter at the mechanics level, so the deciding factor is which game format — table games mixed in or Megaways-heavy slots — matches the session you want to play. Browse the full games catalogue to compare individual titles from both studios before picking a casino.