- Home
- News
- Guides & tips
- 3 Oaks Gaming vs Spinomenal: 88 vs 120 Casinos
3 Oaks Gaming vs Spinomenal: 88 vs 120 Casinos
3 Oaks Gaming is tracked at 88 casinos in our database, while Spinomenal reaches 120 — a gap of 32 venues. The difference in distribution is considerably smaller than the gap between their tracked game catalogues, showing that a larger library does not translate proportionally into more casino integrations.
How many casinos carry 3 Oaks Gaming vs Spinomenal games?
Spinomenal is live at 120 casinos in our records, against 88 for 3 Oaks Gaming — about 27% fewer integrations when measured against Spinomenal’s total. Both counts come from the same in-house availability taxonomy, so the 32-venue gap is directly comparable rather than an artifact of different tracking methods. For a player scanning casino lobbies, Spinomenal therefore has the broader recorded distribution footprint, although 88 tracked casinos still represents substantial coverage for 3 Oaks Gaming.
Game catalogue: 72 titles vs 558 — a scale gap, not a quality one
Spinomenal’s catalogue runs to 558 games in our records, against 72 for 3 Oaks Gaming — roughly a 7.75x difference in tracked volume. 3 Oaks Gaming’s listed line-up includes titles such as 15 Dragon Pearls, 3 China Pots, 3 Clover Pots, 3 Egypt Chests and 3 Hot Chillies — a selection built around themed slots and recurring feature-driven mechanics.
Spinomenal’s much larger catalogue includes 1st of May, 4 Lucky Pin-ups, 88 Lucky Charms, 88 Lucky Fortunes and 8 Lucky Dice, spread across a much deeper release history. Catalogue size is a scale metric rather than a quality score: RTP, volatility, maximum win and feature structure still need to be compared at game level.
Neither provider should be assigned one blanket RTP percentage across its entire portfolio. 3 Oaks Gaming states that RTP is set per title and can be configured differently from casino to casino, while Spinomenal titles may also appear in different RTP versions. The practical takeaway is to check the RTP displayed in the actual game information panel at the operator where the title is being played.
| Criterion | 3 Oaks Gaming | Spinomenal |
|---|---|---|
| Casinos in our database | 88 | 120 |
| Games in our catalog | 72 | 558 |
| Current brand / founding | 3 Oaks brand launched in 2021; rebrand of Booongo, founded in 2015 | Founded in 2014 |
| Company base / operating structure | Isle of Man | Headquartered in Israel; licensed operating entity SubTech Ltd. registered in Malta |
| Leadership | Sebastian Damian, Managing Director | Lior Shvartz, Founder & CEO |
| RTP | Set per title; configurations may vary by casino | Set per title; multiple RTP configurations may be available |
| Testing / compliance | RNG certified by Gaming Associates Europe Limited | BMM Testlabs listed among compliance/testing partners |
Company profiles: 3 Oaks Gaming’s Booongo roots vs Spinomenal’s 2014 launch
3 Oaks Gaming has operated under its current brand since 2021 on the Isle of Man, but it is the rebrand of Booongo, a studio originally established in 2015. The company operates under Managing Director Sebastian Damian. Spinomenal was founded in 2014 by Lior Shvartz, who remains Founder and CEO.
This makes the underlying histories of the two providers much closer than a simple 2014-versus-2021 comparison suggests. Spinomenal’s tracked catalogue is still far larger at 558 games versus 72, but that difference cannot be explained simply by giving Spinomenal a seven-year development head start. Release pace, retained back catalogue, content strategy and the way games are indexed in our database all affect the final count.
3 Oaks Gaming’s current provider profile also describes a portfolio of more than 80 titles and roughly 20 new releases per year, meaning the 72 games in our database should be treated as the number currently tracked rather than necessarily the provider’s complete historical output.
Where do the two providers overlap in casino lobbies?
ViciBet and Spinjo both carry games from 3 Oaks Gaming and Spinomenal, per our availability data, making them practical checkpoints for players who want to compare both studios at the same operator. 22Casino is listed for both providers as well. This overlap is a distribution fact rather than a quality signal — it shows that some operators run broad multi-provider game libraries where titles from both studios appear side by side.
Verdict on 3 Oaks Gaming vs Spinomenal: what the 88-vs-120 gap means for players
The 88-vs-120 casino gap shows that Spinomenal has the wider recorded operator footprint, but the distribution difference is modest compared with its much larger tracked catalogue. Spinomenal has roughly 7.75x as many games in our database, yet appears at only about 1.36x as many casinos as 3 Oaks Gaming. That makes raw game count a poor proxy for how easy a provider is to find in actual casino lobbies.
Players looking for variety may benefit from Spinomenal’s deeper 558-title catalogue, while players interested in 3 Oaks Gaming’s Hold & Win and feature-driven slots still have a substantial 88-casino distribution base to choose from. In either case, RTP should be checked inside the individual game because configurations can differ between operators. Before depositing, checking the casino’s full review and current terms remains the practical step, since game availability, RTP versions and payment conditions can change.
Players comparing provider footprints more broadly can browse the full casino directory or the games catalogue for additional studio-by-studio comparisons.
